Can-Am Spyder Forums banner
1 - 4 of 4 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
72 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 · (Edited)
I was just on the F1 web site and I was left with the impression that it is possibly the WORST site i have ever visited. Here is a summary of my complaints:

1. Too much scrolling. A good web site requires NO to MINIMAL scrolling. Each product line should have its own page so that customers can get what they want with a single click.
2. Probably the worst English grammar I have ever encountered on what is supposed to be a web site for English-speaking customers. WTF is "Again, this idea what we sell already since years is now also as a "COPY" of our
original..."?
3. Atrocious spelling and misused words. I am not counting typos (of which there are many)...only words consistently misspelled. The entire site is rife with misspelled words such as inovations, delievers, FRAM (instead of
FRAME), experiance, "what" instead of "that", "there" instead of "their", seperatly, sizeing, "its self" instead of "itself", grabing.

These are just the errors on the main product page. The entire site is far worse. As an example, the How to Fine tune page is essentially non-existent.

I'm sorry Marcel but someone really needs to proofread your site. What a customer sees when visiting it is a reflection of the quality they can expect in your products. I know they are good but a "stranger" certainly will not get that impression from the web site.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
11 Posts
I was just on the F1 web site and I was left with the impression that it is possibly the WORST site i have ever visited. Here is a summary of my complaints:

1. Too much scrolling. A good web site requires NO to MINIMAL scrolling. Each product line should have its own page so that customers can get what they one with a single click.
2. Probably the worst English grammar I have ever encountered on what is supposed to be a web site for English-speaking customers. WTF is "Again, this idea what we sell already since years is now also as a "COPY" of our
original..."?
3. Atrocious spelling and misused words. I am not counting typos (of which there are many)...only words consistently misspelled. The entire site is rife with misspelled words such as inovations, delievers, FRAM (instead of
FRAME), experiance, "what" instead of "that", "there" instead of "their", seperatly, sizeing, "its self" instead of "itself", grabing.

These are just the errors on the main product page. The entire site is far worse. As an example, the How to Fine tune page is essentially non-existent.

I'm sorry Marcel but someone really needs to proofread your site. What a customer sees when visiting it is a reflection of the quality they can expect in your products. I know they are good but a "stranger" certainly will not get that impression from the web site.
He's right Marcel. You've taken a lot of malicious hits unnecessarily but this you brought on to yourself. Learn from it.
 
1 - 4 of 4 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top